Authors’ will retain their copyright and they will guarantee to Justicia journal the right of first publication of their work, subject to Creative Commons Attribution License simultaneously that allows to third parties to share the work whenever their ,Author and its first publication in this journal. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (eg to be deposited in an institutional telematic file or published in a monographic issue) provided the initial publication is indicated in this journal.
Replacing lens before the migratory context: Inverted migratory reflexes in the relation between human and non human
Corresponding Author(s) : Cristian Reginato Amador
Legem,
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Legem
Abstract
The theme of international migrations develops a series of ideological discussions today, mainly about the impact that this phenomenon occurs in countries, in which it is perceived as a guarantee by natives in which a nationalist supremacy is present in some speeches. However, this narrative always comes from discussions that aim to approach human relations in this context, thus ignoring other agents that also recover the restrictions in the face of migratory reality, which is the case, for example, nonhuman. From this point of view, it is necessary to "change as lenses" and bring to an approach that makes it possible to ponder as consequences in which animals are considered as the main affected. There are, therefore, two points that deserve special attention in this discussion: men involved in transnational mobility processes, or abandoning their animals, or entering a new sovereign space, or making any use of native fauna. Accepting that complex or “different” society becomes the target of exclusion and its imbrication with existing power relations is notorious, and, ignoring that migratory or human context is also another, he ends up ignoring how non-human ones are, likewise migrants. From this, the following question is raised: to what extent or specific character of human diseases makes it difficult to protect humans in migratory realities? To this end, the present study restores organized in two sections. In the first section or objective, the constructs of migratory relations are analyzed in view of the complex and broad context that the experience is made today. In the second section, we outline an approach in which the focus of the discussion is not human, highlighting the reality of how they separate during migration. For this, use the deductive method as approach method and monographic as procedure.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
References
ELIAS, Norbert; Scotson, John. (2000). Os estabelecidos e os outsiders: Sociologia das relações de poder a partir de uma pequena comunidade. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editora.
FRANCIONE. G. (2013). Introdução aos direitos animais: seu filho ou seu cachorro? Campinas: Editora Unicamp.
FRANCIONE, G. L. (2019). Direitos dos animais: Uma abordagem incrementadora. Revista Brasileira de Direito Animal, 14(1), p. 113-129.
MACEDO, Lurdes. (2011). O que é Cosmopolitismo? Caleidoscópio. vol. 8. p. 217- 223.
MARTINE, George. (2005). A globalização inacabada migrações internacionais e pobreza no século 21. Revista São Paulo Perspec. vol.19 no.3 São Paulo, s.p.
ONU. Declaração universal dos Direitos Humanos. Disponível em: https://nacoesunidas.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/DUDH.pdf. Acesso em 12 de dezembro de 2019.
PATARRA, Neide Lopes. (2005). Migrações internacionais de e para o Brasil contemporâneo: volumes, fluxos, significados e políticas. Revista São Paulo Perspec. vol.19 no.3 São Paulo, s.p.
RACHELS, James. (2014). A coisa certa a se fazer: leituras básicas sobre filosofia moral. James Rachels, Stuart Rachels. Tradução por Delamar José Volpato Dutra. - 6. ed. Porto Alegre: AMGH.
REIS, Rossana Rocha. (2004). Soberania, Direitos Humanos e Migrações. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais. vol. 19. n. 55, p. 149-164.
RYDER, R. D. (1998). Speciesism. In: BEKOFF, M. Encyclopedia of animal rights and animal welfare. Westport: Greenwood Press.
SINGER, P. (2002). Ética prática. 3ª ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
PETER, Singer.(2015). Libertação Animal. 40 ANOS. Entrevista. ciÊnciahoje. Universidade federal do rio de janeiro.
STF. RECURSO ESPECIAL No 1.797.175 - SP (2018/0031230-0). Relator Ministro Og Fernandes. JusBrasil. DJe: 28/03/2019. 2019. Disponível em: https://stj.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/692205375/recurso-especial-resp-1797175-sp-2018-0031230-0/relatorio-e-voto-692205398?ref=serp. Acesso em 17 de dezembro de 2019.
TRINDADE. Gabriel. (2014). Animais como pessoas: A Abordagem Abolicionista de Gary L. Francione. Jundiaí: Paco Editora.
UNICEF. Crise migratória venezuelana no Brasil: O trabalho do UNICEF para garantir os direitos das crianças venezuelanas migrantes. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.unicef.org/brazil/crise-migratoria-venezuelana-no-brasil. Acesso em 16 de dezembro de 2019.